Legal Cases

Death penalty Supreme Court cases and New York law.

Read the original opinions, then use coalition guides to understand how courts have shaped capital punishment in the United States and New York.

Start with four landmark decisions

These rulings explain why arbitrary death sentences were struck down, how modern capital sentencing developed, why New York's law stopped working, and why the juvenile death penalty is unconstitutional.

New York Court of Appeals

People v. LaValle

3 N.Y.3d 88 (2004)

A New York Court of Appeals decision that vacated a death sentence and held the state's jury deadlock instruction unconstitutional, making the death penalty unenforceable in New York without legislative repair.

U.S. Supreme Court

Roper v. Simmons

543 U.S. 551 (2005)

Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that it is unconstitutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed while under the age of 18.

What these cases changed

The Court has never ruled that every death sentence is unconstitutional. Instead, these decisions set limits on when capital punishment can be used and exposed how easily a system can become arbitrary.

1972

Furman stopped arbitrary sentencing

In Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court struck down death sentences imposed under laws that gave juries too little guidance. The decision forced states to confront whether punishment was being handed down fairly and consistently.

1976

Gregg allowed new systems, with limits

Gregg v. Georgia allowed some revised death-penalty laws to move forward. It did not end the constitutional questions, it made the rules around sentencing, appeals, and proportional punishment central to every later case.

New York

New York's statute could not stand

People v. LaValle made New York's death-penalty law unenforceable in 2004. The Legislature did not repair it, and the Court of Appeals later confirmed that death sentences could no longer be imposed under the old law.

Still important

Constitutional limits are not a complete answer

Cases such as Roper v. Simmons bar execution for crimes committed before age 18. They show that the law can recognize clear limits while leaving broader questions about fairness, error, and irreversible punishment unresolved.

Keep reading

Use these coalition explainers to connect the cases and understand what they mean for New York.